Restoring Indonesia’s Direct Regional Elections: Stability in a Divided Society


Memo #317

Indonesian President Pak Joko Widodo must fight to reinstate direct regional elections to maintain social stability.

By Matthew J. Bock – m.bock [at] and Geoffrey Macdonald – gpmacdonald [at]

Bock2Macdonald_Geoffrey_photoJoko Widodo, referred to as Jokowi, was inaugurated as Indonesia’s seventh president on October 20, 2014. President Jokowi represents a new era of leadership in Indonesia with his boots-on-the ground style and love of selfies—and because he does not originate from Indonesia’s political elite. But he has inherited a problem that may threaten Indonesia’s social stability: the end of direct regional elections.

On September 26, Indonesia’s House of Representatives voted to end direct elections for mayors, provincial governors, and district heads, the last of which hold significant power in Indonesia’s decentralized democracy. Regional leaders will now be elected by regional legislative councils.

Direct or decentralized regional elections are important because they can promote responsiveness to voters’ needs. Within Indonesia’s corrupt and opaque political environment, accountability mechanisms are critical. Indirect elections remove voters’ ability to punish regional leaders or their parliamentary advocates, who often align in corrupt coalitions of convenience to select regional heads. Moreover, indirect elections effectively block candidates with popular support from entering the marketplace of free elections.

The implications these changes may have on governance and service delivery are important, but the longer-term social repercussions also require attention. Distributing power to the local level provided a voice to conflict-prone ethnic and religious minorities after Suharto’s fall. Decentralizing electoral and political power helped mitigate conflict by giving these groups more control over their daily lives.

Power decentralization and moderate politics work together. Electoral competition over newly localized power has made Indonesian politicians more likely to campaign on and respond to local concerns, such as health care or resettlement. In a deeply divided society, encouraging inclusive, policy-oriented national parties—as opposed to divisive, ethnic parties—reduces conflict. In fact, as decentralization has been institutionalized in Indonesia campaign rhetoric has increasingly focused on moderate policy proposals across elections.

Thus, with this re-centralization of power, Indonesian politics not only becomes less accountable, but also potentially loses the moderation generated by forcing parties to placate local concerns. As ethnic and religious groups lose their stake in the democratic process, the likelihood of conflict increases. President Jokowi and the PDI-P must fight to retain Indonesia’s decentralization laws.

Geoffrey Macdonald is an assistant professor of political science at Grinnell College, Iowa, USA.

Matthew J. Bock is a former research fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta


President Joko Widodo’s first selfie at the palace, taken with campaign volunteers (Credit: Wall Street Journal).

President Joko Widodo’s first selfie at the palace, taken with campaign volunteers (Credit: Wall Street Journal).



Related Memos:

See our other memos on Indonesia

The Year in Malaysian Politics: Democracy’s Crooked Trajectory

Memo #310

By Kai Ostwald – kai.ostwald [at]

Ostwald_photoIn the run-up to Malaysia’s 13th General Election in May 2013, optimists argued that the country had finally transitioned from decades of semi-authoritarian rule to a competitive de-facto two party system of democracy. The election itself exposed several flaws in the system, namely that high levels of malapportionment allowed the… Continue reading

The Thai Political Crisis of 2014: Necessary Cultural and Historical Background

Memo #303

By Jim Placzek – james.placzek [at]

Jim PlaczekThe key to understanding the current crisis in Thailand is Thai national identity. For decades a government office has been successfully promoting symbols of this identity. The central symbol of that identity is the monarchy. The elite of Thailand, including the military, have been called “the network monarchy”and… Continue reading

Modi: Breaking the Mold of Indian Politics (Part 1 of 2)

Memo #296

Narendra Modi’s Historic Electoral Victory.

By John Harriss – jharriss [at]


That Narendra Modi should have won India’s 16th General Election is no great surprise.

But the scale of his triumph is.

Together with most other commentators I expected Modi to win, but thought it likely that he would be… Continue reading

Decision Time for Hong Kong Democracy Fast Approaching

Memo #288

With a raft of elections in the offing, Beijing must soon decide if it will give Hong Kong its promised democracy.

By Jonathan Manthorpe – jonathan.manthorpe [at]

This June 4 will mark the 25th anniversary of the Chinese government’s crackdown on the pro-reform demonstrators in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. Nowhere will that memory resonate… Continue reading

Dealing with the Resource Curse in Myanmar: UN Global Compact and Institutional Capacity

Memo #276

By  Yves Tiberghien – yves.tiberghien [at]

Since it began its gradual opening and domestic process of change, Myanmar has become a great target of opportunity for a myriad of foreign players, especially global investors interested in its vast energy potential and other resources. The challenge for the country is how to turn these blessings into… Continue reading

Beauty Queens in Post War Japan (Video with Dr. Jan Bardsley)

The study of Japanese beauty queens offers insights into democracy and gender issues in post-war Japan. In the 1905s, Japanese beauty queens were often celebrated as models of democracy. They were confident, willing to travel overseas, and represented the idea of upward social mobility. This captured the imagination of Japanese women and for some, signified a step forward for Japanese women’s rights.
However, women in the beauty contests were constructed as images, only allowed to say certain things and unable to complain. This image of beauty queens belies the true situation of Japanese women in the 1950s who were protesting over a lack of equality. Continue reading

Collective Protests in China and India: Unexpected Similarity?

Collective protests against corruption and land grabs are widespread in both China and India. The official Chinese Academy of Social Sciences reported that the government spent $110 billion on containing these and related popular protests in 2011, more than the defense budget. Many argue that disruptive protests erupt because there are no effective institutional channels, such as the judiciary, for expressing grievances in China. However, in neighboring India, the world’s biggest democracy where such channels do exist, people similarly express their discontent through disruptive protests. Though not yet systematically counted, disruptions, both violent and non-violent, are an essential characteristic of Indian democracy. Continue reading

Change in Democratic Mongolia (Video Interview with Dr. Julian Dierkes)

Memo #181 – In this interview, Dr. Julian Dierkes introduces the edited volume “Change in Democratic Mongolia: Social Relations, Health, Mobile Pastoralism, and Mining.” By tracing rapid change in Mongolia in four broad fields of contemporary social relations, the chapters in this volume will elucidate the state of contemporary Mongolia and help us understand Mongolia ten or 20 years from now. Continue reading